Oftentimes, people think of racist thought and action as a thing of the past that forward-thinking, modern citizens no longer have to deal with. Yet groups like Woke Twitter exist to show people that this interpretation of reality is inaccurate. Specifically, the Woke Twitter community is diligent and dedicated in demonstrating the ugly portent and power of racism as it takes shape and form through the fast-paced, interactive world of social media. Thus when real estate agent Penny Sparrow submitted racist suppositions about black South Africans through her personal Facebook account, the words struck a chord with group members and generated discourse both within and outside the online world. Learn more about how this distinct manifestation of racism unfolded by reviewing the short summary that appears below:
Some Specifics Regarding Penny Sparrow’s Suppositions About Blacks
Penny Sparrow is a South African citizen who was somewhat unknown prior to her decision to unleash a dehumanizing, demeaning rant about people of color through her Facebook account. After observing black South Africans on a nearby beach, Sparrow typed a message including her assertion that the people were comparable to monkeys and apes. She then published the statement. Outrage ensued as people grew cognizant of the comment. Some South Africans asserted that the statement, reflective of the apartheid mentality and realities that gave shape and substance to world history, would not be permissible in the contemporary world. Sparrow also received angry text messages and voice mails from individuals who gained access to her number.
Wardle Interprets Racist Rant In Terms Of Constitutional Law
Many people chose to weigh in regarding the significance of Sparrow’s racist suppositions, including legal analyst Brenda Wardle. Wardle viewed the anti-black statements through the lens of the constitution, arguing that the dehumanizing words against black South Africans constituted a type of derogation which the law did not permit. Since the constitution asserts that individuals cannot use their free speech rights to deny other people dignity, Wardle concludes that Sparrow’s equation of South African blacks to animals can be construed as an illegal enunciation.
Who Is Brenda Wardle?
People who are curious about Brenda Wardle’s background and her motivation for discussing Sparrow’s statements should know that the woman is passionate about all things pertaining to the legal sector. At this time, she is working towards her law degree. Upon completing all of the required coursework, Wardle plans to work within the legal field in a manner that generates greater justice and equality in the world.
Wardle on the Pistrorious Trial: